(ESSAY) - FAULKNER´S STYLE - A LECTURE ON STREAM-OF-CONSCIOUSNESS
Miss Rosa´s
interpretation epitomizes the traditional views with which Quentin has grow up.
This "demonizing". this interpretation in terms of inflexible moral
judgement, does not. To his mind, explain: the past remains incredible and
unreal. Nor is he satisfied by his father´s view there´s no meaning at all in
history, that the only proper response is to call it a mistery that we are
"not meant to understand." Father is as close to nihilism here as he
was in the "Sound and the Fury". Quentin is unable to choose between
Miss Rosa´s belief that Southern history was God´s punishment of the South, and
of herself in particular - precisely for what she is unable to image - and
father´s denial of any intelligibility.
Master of
colloquialism in dramatic scene though he is, Faulkner sometimes lays aside
this power in order to put into a character´s mouth the fullest expression of
the narrative´s meaning. The nature Bayard Sartoris, looking back to Civil War
times, telling the story of his boyhood and youth in "The Unvanquished",
opens, what is Faulkner´s most straight-forward narrative, and his only novel
related throughout by one character in the first person, in this strain:
"Behind
the smoke house that summer, Ringo and I had a living map. Although Vicksburg
was just a handful of chips from the woodpile and the River a trench scraped
into the packed earth with the point of a hoe, it (river, city, and terrain)
lived, possessing even in miniature that ponderble though passive recaltrance
of topography which outweighs artillery, against which the most brilliant of
Victories and the most tragic of defeats ar ut noises of a moment."
At times it
seems as though the author, after having created an unsophisticated character
is elbowing him off the stage, as when the rustic Darl Bundren sees "the
square squat shape of the coffin on the saw horses like a cubists bug", or
as when in the short story, "All the Dead Place", the world was
flier. John Sartoris is characterized as having a Vocabulary of "perhaps
two words"and then is made to say.
"... I
knew that if I busted in and dragged him out and bashed his head off. I´d not
only be clinked for life for having infringed the articles of alliance by
invading foreign properly without warrant or something."
Sartre
observed in 1939 that he loved Faulkner´s but hated his metaphysics. Faulkner
wrote, according to Sartre, as though man were completely without a future,
possessed only of a past; but he should write as though man might have a
future. The Glance was all backward in Faulkner; and human life (Sartre added,
in an excellent image that could be illustrated from almost any page of
Faulkner) appeared as a road watched despairingly as it flowed away, from the
rear window of a moving car.
For the most
part, however, the transcending of colloquial verisimilitude in the novels is a
fairly controlled and consistent technique, the characters Faulkner most often
endows with penetration and eloquence being philosophical spectators.
Undoubtedly his chief concern, though, is with a lyrical encompassment of his
narrative´s whole meaning rather than with the reticence of objective
representation.
What Mr.
Faulkner is after, in a sense, is a continuum. He wants a medium without stops
or pauses, a medium which is always of the moment, and of which the passage
from moment to moment is as fluid and undelectable as in the life itself which
he is purpoting to give. It is all inside and underneath, or as seen from
withing and below; the reader must therefore be steadily drawn in; he must be
powerfully and unremittingly hipnotyzed inward and downward to that
image-stream; and this suggests, perhaps, a reason not only for the length and
elaborateness of the sentence structure for the repetitiveness as well.
Thus many of
his characters speak with he tongues of themselves and of William Faulkner. As
Quentin and his Haward roommate Shreve evolve the reconstruction of Thomas
Sutpen´s story which constitutes the second half of "Absalom,
Absalom!", Quentin thinks when Shreve talks, "He sounds just like
father", and later, when Quentin has the floor, Share interrupts with
"Don´t say it´s just me that sounds like your old man", which
certainly shows that Faulkner realizes what he is doing. Actually he does make
some differences among these voices: Miss Rosa rambles and ejaculates with
erratic spensterish emotion, Mr. Compson is elaborately and sometimes
parenthetically ironic, Quentin is most sensitively imaginative and melancholy,
Shreve most detached and humorous. What they have in common is the scope and pitch
of an almost lyrical style which Faulkner has arbitrarily fixed upon for an
artistica instrument.
#RIODEJANEIRO#,
02 DE JANEIRO DE 2019#




Comentários
Postar um comentário