(THESIS) - WILLIAM FAULKNER: TIME AND MYTHOLOGY Manoel Ferreira Neto: THESIS
VIII PART
Surely, the
themes of humanism and traditionalism must be studied about Faulkner. We could
think of most of Faulkner´s perversities, the difficulties he seems to
cultivate, may be explained by this ambition to obtain a total identification
between himself and the reader. Primarily, we could slow down because it´s
possible Faulkner whished to join naturalism and traditionalism. It´s the very
simple.
No longer
merely voices speaking to us in the words of the past, chiefly through direct
and indirect quotation, try now to appear as preserves of a past which must
inshore degree he created in order to be preserved. We are told more of
Quentin´s immediate sensations than we have been tol in our first works.
In Sartoris,
which was published before the "Unvanquished" but which follows it in
historical sequence,the conflict is between young BayardSartoris ( (The Grandson
of the Bayard Sartoris who was a youth in the "Unvanquisthed" and the
Snopes worl of the 1920s)
"General
Johnston or General Forrest wouldn´t have look a Snopes into his army at
all", one of the characters says: but, significantly enough, one Flem
Snopes has come, by way of local political l usefulness, to be vice President
of ol Bayard Sartoris bank.
Bayard
himself is extremely conscious of his family´s doom; he feels cheated because
he did not die violently, in the tradition, like his brother; finally, he kills
himself, taking up an airplane that he knows will crash.
We pointed
out (elsewhere) , in connection with Sartoris, that Faulkner alwys shoved
events when they were already over. In "The Sound and the Fury"
everything has already happened.
The Snopes
world has done more than oppose the Sartorises. It has weakened them internally
(as iot weakened Rosa Millard "in using them for advantage", it has
something of the traditional instinct for noble and disinterested action, under
a vital ethical of the Snopes world upon it, and it is so alien to the habitual
actions of that world, it can only manifest itself in meaningless violence,
ending in self-destruction.
Concerned to
this conception, we would find a basis which could approach and appear another
sense of the world, tie. It does work hard on destruction. But, it would be a
simple view, misconcept, why this basis, accordingly to the angle of our
lecture, seems Faulkner´s word and it´s the key for searching for human being,
and it moves forward to construct hope along time.
"He
whom we seek is gone".
Instead of
being desperate, because is vividly the very difficult to face who whom we seek
is gone, certainly it helps searching for destruction because life is useless
without finding who we are, what our sense in the world is. Timelessness is
responsible for searching for entering our choice.
It is this
which enables us to understand that strange remark by one of the heroes
"Fui. No sum". In this sense, too, Faulkner is able to make man a sum
total without a future.
"The
sum of his climatic experiences", "The sum of his misfortunes",
"The sum of what have you".
The human
being is not only the being by whom "negatités" are disclosed in the
world, he is also the one who can take negative attitudes with respect to
himself. We define consciousness as "a begin, the nature of which is to
question it´s own being, that being implying a being other that itself".
At every moment one draws a linte, since the present is nothing but a chaotic din,
a future that is past. Concerned to this conclusion, its basis is founded in
the sense "He whom we seek is gone", we could express it on the other
hand, "Time whom we seek is gone", meaning the needed of creating it
within our situations, our circumstances, our memories. Faulkner´s vision of
the world can be compared to that of a man sitting in an open car and looking
backward. At every moment, farmless shadows fuckelings, faint tremblings and
patches of light rise upon on either side of him, and only afterward, when he
has a little perspective, do they become trees and man and cars.
The same
pattern recurs, varied somewhat and handled in miniature, in the short story
about the Sartorises - "There was a queen". Here the conflict centers
in Carcissa Benbow, the widow of young Bayard who has given herslf to a
detective in order to recover from his possession a collection of obscene
letters that one of the Snopes had written to her anonymously and afterwar
stolen. Te consciousness of Narcissa´s deed kills the embodiment to the virile
tradition, old (Miss Jenny Sartoris, Mrs, Dupré). Narcissa´s yelding to the
detective is the result of the formalization, allows the Snopes world to betray
her into antitraditionalism by creating a situation in which she must make a
formalized response. It is highly significant factic. For the moment a
tradition begins to be formalized into a coede, it commences to lose vitality;
when it is entirely formalized, it is deal - it becomes pseudo-tradition.
However, though she must make a formalized response, Faulkner transforms a
securalized sense of Art into a searching, Ar is a revelation of man searching
for entering to timelessness; and Faulkner prints his sensivity a sensibility.
Certainly, the reader must observe each feature and detail without knowing when
the next wil happen. The reader faces the stunned revelation of his dream to be
realized at the very quickly. That´s the reason why it´s the very difficult to
hold an analyses because the next might have been confronted with the last one and
we forgot, and we lost the moment. Certainly, it´s difficult to keep an
analyses memorized and confront it weith an antinomy. But we are called to be
response with each situation and moments of ours. Moreover, Faulkner has
revealed his conception of Art, his sensibility. Without response human being
is a psedo-tradition.
The past
takes on a sort of super-reality, its contours aree hard and dear,
unchangeable. The present, nameless and fleeting is helpless before it. It is
full of gaps, and, through these gaps, things of the past fixed motionless and
silent as judges or glances, come to invade it. Faulkner´s monologues remind
one of the airplane trips full of air-pockets.
#RIODEJANEIRO#,
04 DE JANEIRO DE 2019#



Comentários
Postar um comentário